This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Binary Compatibility: vtable entries for final methods


Andrew Haley wrote:

"Changing a class that was declared final to no longer be declared
final does not break [binary compatibility.]"

"Removing the final modifier from a method does not break [binary
compatibility.]"

So, our practice of making direct calls to final methods and not
generating vtable entries for them must cease.  I'm minded to make an
exception for java.lang.Object, because we'd otherwise add a bunch of
vtable entries to every single class for no good reason.

Andrew.


You can still make a direct call to a final method from the same class. Because when you make it non-final you will be recompiling the whole class and will be able to change the calls to go via the vtable.

I agree that you do have to make a vtable entry for all final methods (but not private ones).

David Daney.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]