This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Dave Menendez <dave at sycamore dot us>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:26:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
References: <1083962901.5402.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200405072256.27894.konqueror@gmx.de> <1084220734.3957.33.camel@sai-laptop.wireless.home.menendez.us> <409FE7CA.4060206@redhat.com> <1084225190.3957.48.camel@sai-laptop.wireless.home.menendez.us> <409FFE58.3010605@redhat.com> <1084231360.3957.124.camel@sai-laptop.wireless.home.menendez.us>

Dave Menendez wrote:

I've attached both the C++ header generated by gcjh and the declarations from the original java source, cleaned up a bit, but in the same order in which they appear in both files.

Can you do the same for AbstractClassificationModel? Looks like C++ and GCJ disagree on how many virtual methods there are in that class.

Bryce

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Dave Menendez

References:
- Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Dave Menendez
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Dave Menendez
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Incorrect Java methods called from CNI
  - From: Dave Menendez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]