This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gdb with gcj



On May 1, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:


Bryce McKinlay writes:
On May 1, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:

The last time I investigated this, some of the optimizers (CSE?
loop?) were replacing one variable with another.  This doesn't
change the semantics of the program but the new variable is no
longer marked as a user variable and doesn't carry debug info.

Lets make sure there is a PR on this. We shouldn't have to recompile just to debug.

Well, it's been like that for a long while, and AFAIK it's a hard problem. In theory you can generate DWARF expressions that allow you to calculate what a variable would be if the code were not optimized, but in the general case it's impossible. After all, the "as if" rule allows the compiler completely to rewrite a program.

Sure, I guess its reasonable to expect that with optimization, you won't always get entirely accurate/reliable output when printing local variables. This is how it used to work. But, the problem I see now is that GDB basically refuses to print local variables at all. It doesn't even try - it just says the variables don't exist. So in this respect the problem has become significantly worse in recent months.


Regards

Bryce


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]