This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj-security and some issues

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, Jakob Praher <jpraher at yahoo dot de>, "java at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:05:36 -0700
Subject: Re: gcj-security and some issues
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <1083017947.2476.35.camel@jaques2> <200404270639.59638.konqueror@gmx.de> <1083049885.2355.35.camel@jaques2> <200404270926.07357.konqueror@gmx.de> <1083164042.3970.10.camel@escape> <16529.4974.718054.979612@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 07:38, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I don't see how that would help.  We already have a efficient method
> for mapping a PC address to a class, so going from there to a
> protection domain is just one more memory fetch. 

I was just thinking: shorter binary search, and smaller meta-data.

AG

-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Jakob Praher
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Jakob Praher
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: gcj-security and some issues
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]