Re: [BC ABI] gcj-abi-2-dev-branch created

[Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>]

Tom Tromey wrote:

> > > > > > "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
> > > > > >            
>
> Per> If the plan is to for the foreseeable future to support two ABI's
> Per> in the same source tree, do we really need a separate branch?
>
> I think this code is pretty intrusive, so a branch makes sense while
> we iron out the bugs.
>  

Hopefully the branch won't be around for too long, its really just a 
place for us to share changes/hacks which arn't ready for mainline yet. 
I personally don't like the idea of having too many branches to deal 
with ;-)

> Per> In any case, is there a design document?  If not, we need one now.
>
> There was an IBM paper about an approach to this that serves as a
> useful starting point.  It is easily googled.  

Also Dachuan Yu's paper* "Supporting Binary Compatibility with Static 
Compilation"*

http://flint.cs.yale.edu/flint/publications/bincomp.html

Regards

Bryce