This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:01:35 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0305041319370.41531@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><87llxjki7o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0312142309250.76198@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><87hdzynkcx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401021505130.29381@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>> (This is PR7305, and it would be really nice to fix this for GCC 3.4.
>>> in fact, it is, somehow, a regression against earlier versions of GCC.)
>> I set target-milestone=3.4 for it.
> Thanks!
I just noticed we haven't made any progress on that, probably also because
Steven (incorrectly) qualified this as an enhancement and move the target
milestone to 3.5.0. :-(
(On why this is also a regression fix, see
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7305#c2>.)
>> I.e., instead of $(includedir)/c++/$(version), $(includedir)/gcj/$(version),
>> etc, why not make $(includedir)/$(version)/ as the base, and then
>> install headers directly under that?
> I think that would be really helpful and make things more maintainable
> and logical!
We probably "just" need a volunteer who is sufficiently familiar with the
build system.
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/