This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [kaffe] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
- From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- To: Chris Gray <chris at kiffer dot eunet dot be>
- Cc: java-gnome-developer at lists dot sourceforge dot net, Mark Howard <mh at debian dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, debian-java at lists dot debian dot org, kaffe at kaffe dot org, sablevm-developer at lists dot sourceforge dot net
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:23:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: [kaffe] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
- References: <20040311174441.GA26451@pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk> <200403120014.i2C0EhGf051673@pigsty.cats.cradle>
Chris Gray wrote:
On Thursday 11 March 2004 18:44, Mark Howard wrote:
The big question is: should we switch to CNI?
No.
Though I'm obviously in the CNI "camp", I tend to agree.
But I think the folloup-question is: should java-gnome
switch from JNI-only implementation to some kind of dual
JNI-or-CNI mechanism. I.e. explore ways to reduce the
overhead of JNI when CNI is avaliable. I suggested one
approach in my previous email (which may be waiting for
moderator approval on the kaffe and java-gnome lists).
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/