This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, "Boehm, Hans" <hans dot boehm at hp dot com>, "'Michael Koch'" <konqueror at gmx dot de>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:19:25 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Eventually the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL kludge will go away, but until then we
> have to deal with the possibility that people will use gcj with
> libraries that need to use LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3. We don't want to
> break libgcj in such situations.
If "we" == "Linux distribution vendors", then yes definitely. But I'd
expect nearly everyone building and using their own gcj would want
Anthony's patch.
Not that I'm advocating yet-another configure switch...
Jeff