This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Boehm, Hans" <hans dot boehm at hp dot com>, "'Michael Koch'" <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:12:20 +0000
Subject: RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
References: <0C3EFB691636964BBF914AE56AE83A89501F95@hplex4.hpl.hp.com><1078120122.3462.572.camel@escape><16451.6218.75908.341424@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><1078148241.3462.591.camel@escape>

Anthony Green writes:
 > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 03:02, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > What happens with this test case if you use LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3?
 > 
 > Segmentation fault.  Do you think this means we shouldn't use this?

Yes, I think it does.  We shouldn't crash with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
  - From: Anthony Green

References:
- RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
  - From: Anthony Green
- RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
  - From: Andrew Haley
- RE: libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation
  - From: Anthony Green

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]