This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: overhead of reflection info
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans dot boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: Adam Megacz <adam at megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Feb 2004 11:06:43 -0700
- Subject: Re: overhead of reflection info
- References: <0C3EFB691636964BBF914AE56AE83A89501F7A@hplex4.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans.boehm@hp.com> writes:
Hans> There is a claim in _Jv_MarkObj comments that some data
Hans> structures referenced from class objects are allocated
Hans> pointerfree (even though they are not?) but then traced
Hans> correctly by _Jv_MarkObj. If this is indeed still correct, this
Hans> would have to be looked at carefully.
Oh, yeah -- _Jv_MarkObj is always used for Class objects. We can't
represent those using bitmap descriptors, I think. That comment is
still correct.
Tom