This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist:gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mohan Embar <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>, <tromey at redhat dot com>, <tcallawa at redhat dot com>, <c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se>, "'java'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist:gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > What if libgcj looks for --enable-intermodule, as gcc itself now does?
> > I'd take that to mean "I have lots of memory, so build in a way that gives
> > better optimizations and may build faster". Not unlike the current libgcj
> > situation.
>
> Sounds good. Trouble is, we are using this "compile everything at
> once" to get around a libtool (and/or shell) bug, aren't we?
Not for the .java->.class build, but if we're thinking about adopting
the same approach for .java->.o we'd need to make some compromises for
space, perhaps build one package at a time.
Jeff