This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
- From: Mohan Embar <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, tcallawa at redhat dot com, c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se, "'java'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:56:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
- Reply-to: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com
Hi Andrew,
> > > I'm not sure that we can require huge memory to build libgcj.
> >
> > What if libgcj looks for --enable-intermodule, as gcc itself now does?
> > I'd take that to mean "I have lots of memory, so build in a way that gives
> > better optimizations and may build faster". Not unlike the current libgcj
> > situation.
>
>Sounds good. Trouble is, we are using this "compile everything at
>once" to get around a libtool (and/or shell) bug, aren't we?
No. This was purely a cool optimization which I thought would speed
build time and be harmless. (Ha!) The old way worked just fine, albeit
slower on systems which had enough memory.
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/