This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
- From: "Christian Joensson" <c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se>
- To: <tromey at redhat dot com>, <tcallawa at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "'java'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:05:43 +0200
- Subject: RE: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
- Reply-to: <c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se>
I'm sorry, but I don't have a 64-bit capable gdb installed...
But, I see "big" memory usage, on this 128 MB old box (with 256 MB swap)...
Might the memory available be a problem?
On a Pentium-II with the same amount of memory, I get no problem, but
similar 36%-ish memory usage...
Spot, how's a 64-bit capable gdb coming in Aurora? I haven't found the time
to dig into this, sigh... sorry
Cheers,
/ChJ
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com]
Sent: den 11 september 2003 01:16
To: Christian Joensson
Cc: java
Subject: Re: Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles:
@libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Joensson <c.christian.joensson@comhem.se>
writes:
Christian> Aurora SPARC Linux 1.0 (Ansel) Ultra1 single UltraSparc I sun4u:
I haven't done a build on one of these...
Christian> gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
Christian> Any ideas?
I haven't seen this before. It could be some kind of sparc-specific
bug, I suppose. Could you look into it? Or at least send a stack
trace of jc1?
Tom