This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inexplicable Parameter-Passing Phenomena w/MinGW GCJ

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
To: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>,Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>,Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>,GCJ Java <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:02:54 +1200
Subject: Re: Inexplicable Parameter-Passing Phenomena w/MinGW GCJ

On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 12:30 Pacific/Auckland, Mohan Embar wrote:

Hi People,

This might or might not be related, but this code yells "Miranda
Method!" to me. setOption() is defined in the interface
SocketOptions, which is implemented (but not defined) in the
abstract class DatagramSocketImpl and finally implemented in the
class
natPlainDatagramSocketImplXXX.

I really simple thing to check would be to explicitly defined
setOption() as an abstract method in the class DatagramSocketImpl.

Can Miranda bugs be platform specific ? it works here on Linux.

I can vouch for this working on Linux.

How about trying it with -findirect-dispatch?

Regards

Bryce.

References:
- Re: Inexplicable Parameter-Passing Phenomena w/MinGW GCJ
  - From: Mohan Embar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]