This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcj has some j2ee classes but not all

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Ryan Boder <icanoop at bitwiser dot org>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Aug 2003 20:52:45 -0600
Subject: Re: libgcj has some j2ee classes but not all
References: <20030807023645.GC2667@bitwiser.org><87fzke6r4v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><20030807224824.GD6166@bitwiser.org>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Ryan" == Ryan Boder <icanoop@bitwiser.org> writes:

>> It all depends on the licensing and copyright assignment stuff.

Ryan> Jboss is LGPL. So is the reason gcj can't use an existing J2EE
Ryan> implementation because they would have to assign the copyright
Ryan> to the FSF, you can't just take it?

Yeah, that's part of it.  Also, libgcj isn't LGPL.  It is
"GPL+exception", like libgcc.

Tom

References:
- libgcj has some j2ee classes but not all
  - From: Ryan Boder
- Re: libgcj has some j2ee classes but not all
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libgcj has some j2ee classes but not all
  - From: Ryan Boder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]