This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Kava for GCJ?

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Jul 2003 19:04:27 -0700
Subject: Re: Kava for GCJ?
Organization: Myself
References: <m1vfuk5shk.fsf@nowhere.com> <3F03C418.4070801@bothner.com> <20030704200924.GB28689@falcon.pds.twi.tudelft.nl>

"C. van Reeuwijk" <C.vanReeuwijk@its.tudelft.nl> writes:
> unboxing? Instead of annotating a class as 'by value', and placing
> restrictions on it, why not let the compiler itself discover classes
> with these restrictions?

Because treating a class as 'by value' alters the semantics of

  Thing a = new Thing();
  Thing b = a;

  - a

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kava for GCJ?
  - From: C. van Reeuwijk

References:
- Kava for GCJ?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: Kava for GCJ?
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Kava for GCJ?
  - From: C. van Reeuwijk

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]