Re: gcj, gij; dynamic compile problem?

[Steve Pribyl <steve at netfuel dot com>]

Seems to be a problem with RH 7.3.  The code worked fine on RH 9.

Don't know what is wrong with 7.3.  I suspect libdl and ld.  It could 
be the 2.4.19 kernel but that seems unlikely. I suspect that Steve W. is 
2.4.18, and RH 9 is 2.4.20.

Thanks

Steve Pribyl wrote:
> Steve et all,
>
> The "new" that is used is from the boehm gc.  I am inclined to think to 
> agree with Tom that it is not glibc but in libdl or the ld.
> I ran the same test using the same gcc build(built on RH7.3) on RH 9 box 
> and it worked better.  Actually ran the code but died in _fini unloading 
> libgcj, again  possibly pointing to a libdl, ld problem.
>
> I am rebuilding gcc on RH 9 to try the test again.  r
>
>
> weppnesp@eckerd.edu wrote:
>
> > Steve, How old is your glibc? I have 2.2.5, perhaps an update is 
> > needed to 2.3 for gcj
> > and gij such that only the static switch works. Anybody else know 
> > about how many
> > of the newer features of glibc are used in gcj?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  Steve Weppner
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent via Eckerd IMP: http://webmail.eckerd.edu


--
Steve Pribyl
Steve AT NetFuel dot com
Computer Infrastructure Practitioner

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature