This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Package-private access checking in GCJ 3.3
- From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- To: "Ranjit Mathew" <rmathew at hotmail dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:13:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: Package-private access checking in GCJ 3.3
- References: <BAY1-F518x96PnPlpNv000385ec@hotmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 07:00 schrieb Ranjit Mathew:
> > > 4.
> > > gnu.java.nio.{Byte,Char,Double,Float,Int,Long,Short}BufferImpl
> > > illegally use the respective constructors in base classes
> > > java.nio.{Byte,Char,Double,Float,Int,Long,Short}Buffer.
> > >
> > > 5. gnu.java.nio.ByteBufferImpl illegally uses "backing_buffer"
> > > from java.nio.ByteBuffer.
> >
> >Are you using 3.3 branch ? These files are already moved to
> > java.nio because of this private access stuff. Jikes found this
> > problems for me in classpath ....
> >
> >I think the only problems are with files not (yet) merged with
> >classpath. Of course some are libgcj special and will never be
> >merged.
>
> Yes, I am using the 3.3 branch. However, I still would recommend
> fixing these problems in this branch, if we say that we want to
> have this bug fixed for 3.3.1 (tentatively scheduled for the 4th of
> July, AFAICT).
>
> If we don't, well, don't bother.
At least for the NIO stuff this would mean a bigger restructuring to
do it right. I dont think thats okay for 3.3 branch as its in only
bug fixing mode.
Michael
- --
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+9oyIWSOgCCdjSDsRAoJgAKCUMcZqgJQDFPNHtOJZ0Fv6LLyJZQCgjOsd
eUvN3M415uVyVhWpBi3ln/M=
=qRxO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----