This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: <class>.o vs <class>.class

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: steve <steve at netfuel dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Jun 2003 07:26:38 -0600
Subject: Re: <class>.o vs <class>.class
References: <3EDE970D.1090109@netfuel.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "steve" == steve  <steve@netfuel.com> writes:

steve> It seems that this CNI conflicts with the use of class loaders.

steve> If you compile a set of jars to libraries you can't use class loaders
steve> any more.

steve> Are there any plans or ideas to get the functionality?

I'm not sure exactly what you're seeing.

But, yeah, this is an area in flux.  There's a big "solib: URL" patch
still pending that affects this area.  It will eventually go in.

Also on the trunk -fno-assume-compiled works a bit better than it does
in 3.3; this can be useful for compiling Java code in a
classloader-friendly way.  Long term we're going to use the
-findirect-dispatch approach.

Tom

References:
- <class>.o vs <class>.class
  - From: steve

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]