This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409

From: erik poupaert <erik dot poupaert at chello dot be>
To: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 12 May 2003 13:16:05 +0200
Subject: Re: Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409
Organization:
References: <1051779546.2598.84.camel@presariolinux> <200305121206.43677.konqueror@gmx.de> <1052735440.2609.28.camel@presariolinux> <200305121309.59401.konqueror@gmx.de>

> Probably its already included in your gcj from Mohan. The one in our 
> CVS is AFAIK maintained while the one on SF is not.

You're right.

It's also called "jar". I'm just a bit wary of the fact that the version
doesn't say anywhere that I'm actually using fastjar. It's output looks
identical to the jdk/jar. Since the jdk still sits on my win2K machine
as well, I could be using jdk/jar instead of gcc/fastjar. I just hope it
won't make accidentally trouble with me later on, when I definitively
uninstall the jdk.

References:
- Building on Ret Hat 9 and deploying on Red Hat 8
  - From: erik poupaert
- Re: Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409
  - From: erik poupaert
- Re: Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]