This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj and jikes

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: bormisoft at digitizeit dot de, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 17:11:43 +0100
Subject: Re: gcj and jikes
References: <200305061524.h46FOpCA032626@s02.canserver.net><3EB7D8C3.9060704@bothner.com>

Per Bothner writes:
 > bormisoft@digitizeit.de wrote:
 > > I'm just occasionally following this list and read the thread about
 > > integrating jikes. As far as I understand one of the main reasons for
 > > integrating jikes is to be able to support generics.
 > 
 > No, generics is one of the main reasons for *not* (yet) integrating
 > Jikes.  The reasons for integrating Jikes is it is supposedly has
 > fewer bugs and cleaner design.
 > 
 >  > Has anybody thought of using the internal eclipse compiler? I
 >  > remember reading somewhere, that they already have preliminary
 >  > generics support.
 > 
 > Interesting.  They really do have an indepdendent compiler?

Yeah, they really do.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj and jikes
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- Re: gcj and jikes
  - From: bormisoft
- Re: gcj and jikes
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]