This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: verify?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Julia Smith" <julias at macrovision dot com>
- Cc: <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 28 Feb 2003 16:57:33 -0700
- Subject: Re: verify?
- References: <0825777F1074924EB8338D68E48CC2560D7BA7@mail.macrovision.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Julia" == Julia Smith <julias at macrovision dot com> writes:
Julia> gcj -c jce-jdk12-118.jar
Julia> spits up a ton of errors compiling X509Certificates. It seems like the
Julia> native version compiled into libgcj does not expose abstract methods
Julia> defined in the interface X509Extension, which X509Certificate leaves
Julia> "virtual".
Sounds like the Miranda method problem.
Julia> I also do not know how your site claims log4j version 1.2 compiles and
Julia> runs against gcj. It requires the javax/jms package which is notably
Julia> missing from gcc3.2.2.
I searched the html for http://gcc.gnu.org/java and couldn't find any
mention of log4j. Can you point me at this claim?
Julia> I'd really love to get bouncy castle compile or just get my
Julia> hands on a .o that has a working version of bc in it. *sweat*
Did you try rhug? rhug has a build environment for BC.
Tom