This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 13 Feb 2003 10:54:01 -0700
Subject: Re: Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
References: <3E4AA60D.D8D7E13E@hotmail.com><15947.24758.896086.669874@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><87k7g4vzug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><15947.56503.958963.635127@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> I don't think it's a binutils bug.  AFAICS the problem is that the
Andrew> addr2line that's in gcc doesn't play with the c++filt in binutils.
Andrew> The addr2line in binutils is OK.  I think...

That's even better.  We could fix or delete the gcc addr2line.
In theory :-)

Tom

References:
- Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]