This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status page

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:40:23 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Status page
References: <3E488B1D.8020805@pop.agri.ch><Pine.LNX.4.44.0302110636410.20657-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Andreas Tobler wrote:
 > > > IMO, only ports that catch null pointer exceptions in our testcases
 > > > and have a working class loader can be described as "OK" without
 > > > further qualification.  I suggest gcj on Irix be described as "works,
 > > > but unfinished" on the status page.
 > >
 > > How do we call the darwin port? Nearly ready? Soon ready?
 > 
 > Darwin needs threads.  Surely it isn't very useful without threads.

True, but I would have expected more test failures with no threads at
all.

Andrew.

References:
- Re: Status page
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: Status page
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]