This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Feb 2003 12:39:06 -0700
Subject: Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
References: <3E3F9906.9000601@hotmail.com> <1044364796.8163.5.camel@gao-2001><1044365791.8125.16.camel@gao-2001> <871y2oklw8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><b1p4bo$pkg$1@main.gmane.org>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Ranjit" == Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@hotmail.com> writes:

Ranjit> I am not certain that it is a bug since the truly perplexing
Ranjit> part for me is that the same code is present in
Ranjit> startProcess( ) in java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc but *that*
Ranjit> doesn't give any errors during the libgcj build process!

I'm certain it is a bug.  That should work, and we have independent
confirmation of failure.

Tom

References:
- Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
  - From: Weiqi Gao
- Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
  - From: Weiqi Gao
- Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Weird GCJ/CNI Behaviour
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]