This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswithstatic libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:49:32 -0800
Subject: Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswithstatic libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211211859320.10438-100000@ops2.one-point.com> <001901c2924c$e75b5f10$3c16a8c0@mantatest.com> <86zns14c55.fsf@nowhere.com> <1038000382.783.14.camel@elsschot> <15842.3233.134299.96917@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <86hee292ux.fsf@nowhere.com> <86adju92pv.fsf@nowhere.com> <87ptsqog3i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <86y97e7il2.fsf@nowhere.com> <87smxmk1xh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <86fztm7dbg.fsf@nowhere.com> <15845.55737.188935.778451@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <867keyt3e6.fsf@nowhere.com> <15845.63522.365032.442757@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

In any case, here's a question: if we lose line numbers in stack
traces, is that a disaster?  Does it matter?

It's not a disaster, but it matters.  I use stack traces as a
debugging aid (as in new Error("foo").printStackTrace()), at least
when I use JDK.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

Follow-Ups:
- Line numbers in stack traces [was: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith]static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Scott Gilbertson
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, butcrasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, butcrasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: GCJ application runs not too bad with shared libs, but crasheswith static libs - seems to be in _Jv_MonitorEnter
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]