This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- Cc: gcj mail list <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 16 Nov 2002 13:12:37 -0700
- Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
- References: <20021115214953.GE18208@skyjammer.com><20021115224910.GA769@iliana> <20021115230047.GF18208@skyjammer.com><20021116003555.GA1506@iliana> <20021116004716.GA27583@skyjammer.com><1037423059.30548.41.camel@elsschot><20021116091251.GA5638@skyjammer.com><1037460928.12460.61.camel@elsschot>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:
[ redirected from the debian java list ]
Mark> gjdoc is still very alpha level code. I think your best bet is
Mark> the gjdoc-native package (gjdoc compiled with gcj to native
Mark> code) but I have to admit that I didn't get it working correctly
Mark> just now. The biggest problem is that you will currently need
Mark> the sources of the core libraries (which you can get through
Mark> 'apt-get source classpath').
Is gjdoc something we should include in libgcj?
Can we, licensing-wise? I think for an application like this we can
go with the plain GPL; it is only the runtime that needs the exception.
Since our goal is to ship a complete system, it seems that including a
javadoc replacement would make sense.
Tom