This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

.class code optimization


Hi, I guess the question has alerady been anwered on the ML but I can't find it using ht:/Dig.
Is there any specific reason .class produced by GCJ are no better (well, only slightly better in fact) that javac ones?
Shuoldn't dead code elimination and other optimization come automatical using GCC?

But maybe Java standard needs unoptimized classes to have better performance in the HotSpot VM maybe..?
Or just the work to enable optimization hasn't yet been done?

Please Cc me as I'm not subscriber to the ML.

Thanks, Lapo

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]