This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: who's been mucking with EXEEXT?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Aug 2002 16:44:33 -0600
- Subject: Re: who's been mucking with EXEEXT?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208272351160.31429-100000@ops2.one-point.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
Jeff> Hmm... I agree that is wrong, but I don't see how it could've
Jeff> broken recently:
Back when this code was written, I think the gcc build added `.exe'
suffixes based on the target and not the host. This was incorrect,
and I don't remember why it wasn't changed, but we just accommodated
that. Perhaps that has changed in the meantime.
Jeff> Anyway, am I incorrect saying that gcjh is a host utility but
Jeff> EXEEXT is a target setting?
You're not incorrect.
Jeff> 2002-08-27 Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
Jeff> * Makefile.am (ZIP, GCJH): Remove $(EXEEXT).
Looks good to me. I set up a mingw build today. I'll test this and
if it works for linux native and linux-x-mingw I will check it in.
Now that I have plenty of disk space again, I'm just going to leave my
mingw build around so I can test it from time to time.
Tom