This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [patch] fastjar documentation
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, "<java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 29 Aug 2002 12:15:52 -0600
- Subject: Re: [patch] fastjar documentation
- References: <Pine.SOL.4.44.0208272142130.23371-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
Joseph> If MAKEINFOFLAGS (which is meant to be for the user, but I
Joseph> don't think that generally works in GCC) doesn't work either,
Joseph> then wait until GCC moves to a more recent Automake.
That will be a long wait just to add a doc patch.
Joseph> Or will Automake handle using += on MAKEINFO to add the flags
Joseph> sensibly?
Not Automake 1.4.
I'd prefer we not get hung up on the version problem. I don't see any
real problem with the fastjar docs having their own version number.
In fact it makes sense for the docs to follow the executable.
Tom