This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj? :/

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: QQ <algis at dammit dot lt>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 15:01:10 +1200
Subject: Re: gcj? :/
References: <200207010023.g610NSUL029306@tango.euteka.lt> <864rfjxoa2.fsf@megacz.com>

Adam Megacz wrote:

QQ <algis@dammit.lt> writes:

I've been looking for Win32 version of gcc java compiler (gcj), not
dependent on cygwin1.dll to no avail :(
I don't think that such a thing exists

Right, the compiler itself is written for POSIX and its hard to imagine it ever running on windows without cygwin.dll or some other posix library.

I found out somewhere that mingw includes it, but I wasnt been able
to find a link to download it either :/
I think a long time ago, somebody hacked gcc2.95 to work on mingw
without cygwin. I've never seen a 3.x sieres gcc that worked on
cygwin, nor a gcj.

Huh? I have heard several reports that GCJ 3.1 works on cygwin. There is a small problem with hash synchronization and the cygwin linker, but 3.1.1 should work out-of-the-box because we disabled hash synchronization by default (for cygwin).

regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj? :/
  - From: Adam Megacz

References:
- Re: gcj? :/
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]