This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Major 3.1 branch Java regressions

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: aoliva at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Major 3.1 branch Java regressions
References: <20020516.193915.35164715.davem@redhat.com><orn0uzo08z.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

   From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
   Date: 17 May 2002 01:40:28 -0300

   Anyway, I've just verified that reverting my
   patch doesn't fix the problem, though.

I've just verified this too.

   > The only functional changes from the 3.1 release to the current branch
   > are c++ frontend changes.

   Which can't possibly affect gcj's ability to find libgcj.jar, which is
   the reason for the failures I've seen.

Ok, this seems to indeed be the case.

   Like you, I couldn't find anything in the diffs since the last
   snapshot that helped figure out the reason for this difference :-(

It is mysterious.  Your theory about the version string still sounds
interesting though.

References:
- Major 3.1 branch Java regressions
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: Major 3.1 branch Java regressions
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]