This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr &F LAGS)" failed:
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: "'Billinghurst, David (CRTS)'" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 08 May 2002 10:55:49 -0600
- Subject: Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr &F LAGS)" failed:
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF2B0@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
Hans> Locking a statically allocated plain java.lang.Object may be an
Hans> issue, since I think it's too small.
Right now we only statically allocate arrays and Class objects.
Someday we may add Strings. It would be nice if the compiler could
internally enforce the above constraint, so that if we make other
changes in the future it will complain, but I don't think that's
possible.
Tom