This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 Apr 2002 15:15:59 -0600
- Subject: Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10204221649550.13035-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
>> In the 3.0 and 3.1 branch, libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 is used. Is this
>> intended, or should the soname changed for the 3.1 release? If not,
>> can the libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 from 3.1 used as a replacement for 3.0's
>> libgcjgc?
Jeff> Actually I don't think libgcjgc.so is used anymore, and needn't
Jeff> be installed, right?
I was just going to say the same thing. I think the same applies to
zlib as well. We can just use noinst_ and then we don't need to worry
about the soname.
Tom