This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: "'Andrew Haley'" <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'drepper at redhat dot com'" <drepper at redhat dot com>, "MOSBERGER, DAVID (HP-PaloAlto,unix3)" <davidm at hpl dot hp dot com>
- Date: 19 Apr 2002 18:15:08 -0600
- Subject: Re: serious(?) glibc backtrace() problem on IA64
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF1F6@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
Hans> None seems to have spoken up, so how's the attached branch from
Hans> a nonexpert? I definitely want this in the branch; I'm less
Hans> sure about the trunk. If it's approved, I would also appreciate
Hans> a volunteer to regenerate configure after I check it in, since
Hans> I'm not sure I have the right version of autoconf.
I think this is fine. It would be a bit better if we could really
test backtrace(), but I'm not too concerned about it, since in the
future we'll be moving to something else anyway.
I'm going to apply it and run autoconf and check it in.
Thanks.
Tom