This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: walking the stack

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 15 Apr 2002 19:59:17 -0700
Subject: Re: walking the stack
Organization: Myself
References: <1018858471.8486.23.camel@dhcppc2> <3CBA9147.5070703@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <86elhgykms.fsf@megacz.com> <3CBB7C6C.8010504@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>


Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> > Is there any way to get line numbers this way, or would the stack
> > trace be limited to class/method names?
> 
> No, there would be no way to get line number info from a stripped binary 
> - it would just be class/method names.

So would it make sense to have a three stage fallback here
(DWARF2->addr2line()->reflection_data)?

  - a

-- 
The web is dead; long live the Internet.
http://www.xwt.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: walking the stack
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- walking the stack
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: walking the stack
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: walking the stack
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: walking the stack
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]