Re: gcj-mingw is ready for inclusion in gcc 3.1

[Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>]

Adam Megacz wrote:

>I've heard rumors of moving towards one .o per package for
>libgcj... do you think we could include an option to disable this
>behavior in the configury? That way you don't have to rebuild a whole
>package when you change just one source file. It would also help me a
>lot with my unreachable method stripping stuff.
>

Yep, I want to have the option to build either way. Its a trade-off 
between quicker total rebuild time (and avoiding platform command line 
length limits) and possibly quicker partial rebuilds. Of course if you 
modify something like java.lang.Object that everything else depends on, 
then the package-at-a-time method will still be quicker.

regards

Bryce.