Re: [freenet-devl] Re: GCJ runs (a bit) (was: GCJ status 20020305)

[Göran Thyni <goran at kirra dot net>]

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:00:08PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> This is good news. Did you have to make any changes to freenet's code to 
> compile it with GCJ? I quickly (and without hacking any code) tried to 
> build it recently but got stuck because it needed junit, which itself 
> required some javax.swing classes that we don't have (but will soon, 
> hopefully).

I just tried compiling the node itself, no clients.
The node bit doesn't have those dependencies AFAIKS.

> At this point I would reccomend using the GCC 3.1 branch rather than the 
> trunk/mainline. The mainline is a bit unstable right now due to branch 
> landings (right now libjava is not even building on i686 linux).

OK,
I checked and an important recent fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2002-q1/msg00585.html
is in the 3.1 branch so it should work.

regards,
-- 
Göran Thyni
 Luleĺ / Kiruna, Sweden

Attachment: msg00116/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature