This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: _Jv_InitPrimClass?

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Mar 2002 17:42:26 -0800
Subject: Re: _Jv_InitPrimClass?
Organization: Myself
References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF02C@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>


"Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
> That's a less stringent sanity test than the one for just PrimClasses, but
> it seems a bit cleaner.

Good point. Bugs will (probably) still get caught on platforms that
don't need the alignment hack.

> Does this sound tolerable?

If you add this, could you also toss an extra line into the configury
to enable it on Win32?

  - a

-- 
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'."                                     --lynx_user_abroad

Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com

References:
- RE: _Jv_InitPrimClass?
  - From: Boehm, Hans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]