This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?

From: Martin Kahlert <martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:00:37 +0100
Subject: Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
References: <20020226084445.A23121@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10202260851390.29410-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
Reply-to: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com

Hi Jeff,
thanks for your help.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:42:01AM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> > I thought that possibly libgcj is created without -fPIC
> 
> libgcj.a is always built without -fPIC, whether or not you
> --enable-shared.  You may have noticed that libtool compiles each source
> twice, once with PIC, once without.
No. I did not know that. But now it's clearer to me, why it lasts that long.


> In theory you could build libgcj with -prefer-pic and get what you want...
> I tried this and it didn't seem to work.
So you do not see any way to produce one standalone shared lib for that?

Thanks again,
Martin.

-- 
The early bird catches the worm. If you want something else for       
breakfast, get up later.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

References:
- Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
  - From: Martin Kahlert
- Re: jni and static libgcj and friends?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]