This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

From: Brian Jones <cbj at gnu dot org>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 24 Feb 2002 21:11:09 -0500
Subject: Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
References: <3C78B3B6.5000303@waitaki.otago.ac.nz><87it8mbse7.fsf@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk><3C797FAA.9070305@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

> So, is there anything important that we would lose from such a change?
> Is there anything that libtool can do that GCC will never be able to
> do? What platforms do we care about that GCC currently cant build a
> shared library on (windows perhaps?).

Mingw GCC produces .dll files just fine.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <cbj@gnu.org>

References:
- Makefile problems
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Makefile problems
  - From: Nic Ferrier
- Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]