Re: DNS JNDI provider

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Pete" == Pete Chown <Pete.Chown@skygate.co.uk> writes:

Pete> 2.  I've had a look at some of the documentation about
Pete> submitting patches to gcc, and they indicate that I should
Pete> provide test cases.  Of course this is a good thing.  However,
Pete> what test cases would you like to see for a DNS component?  At
Pete> the moment I have a test zone which I install.  It is not
Pete> published on the Internet; rather it is just installed as
Pete> "test." in the local named.conf.

I wonder if a Mauve test is appropriate here, given that it is not an
externally-specified package.  I don't know of a better place to put
the tests though.

I think as long as the test procedure is documented and is in theory
reproducible on some other system (than yours), then that is good
enough.  Some things are simply hard to test.

Pete> People are going to get annoyed, I imagine, if they run the gcc
Pete> tests and get failures because they don't have this zone
Pete> installed.

We can set things up so that these tests aren't run by default.

Tom