This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: More questions about _GLOBAL

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 29 Jan 2002 13:58:37 -0800
Subject: Re: More questions about _GLOBAL
References: <86k7u2cov3.fsf@megacz.com> <3C559C34.9000209@bothner.com><863d0pujol.fsf_-_@megacz.com> <1012336450.4127.10.camel@dhcppc2><86elk8rgka.fsf@megacz.com> <3C571A67.3080707@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 13:55, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> In that case it should be fine to remove the __GLOBAL_foo.bar.baz. There 
> is no point registering a class which does not exist, after all. 

Except that I'm pretty sure we create one of these per .o, so the
function may register multiple classes.

AG

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More questions about _GLOBAL
  - From: Adam Megacz

References:
- banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*?
  - From: Per Bothner
- More questions about _GLOBAL
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: More questions about _GLOBAL
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: More questions about _GLOBAL
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: More questions about _GLOBAL
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]