This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance)

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Tuomas Leikola <tuomas dot leikola at digia dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:37:17 +1300
Subject: Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance)
References: <05d201c1a7e4$f99afa30$3a090a0a@tobo> <3C55EFB3.2040603@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <074401c1a8bf$50e2b820$3a090a0a@tobo>

Tuomas Leikola wrote:

>god. the next you are going to say that final java.lang.String is not
>getting inlined all over?
>
Yes. Actually you don't want them "inlined all over" because they are 
too big for inlining to do much good in most cases.

In libgcj they are also written in native code.

regards

Bryce.

References:
- Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance)
  - From: Tuomas Leikola
- Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance)
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance)
  - From: Tuomas Leikola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]