This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCJ slower than JDK?

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Fernando Lozano <fernando at lozano dot eti dot br>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:13:37 -0800
Subject: Re: GCJ slower than JDK?
References: <3C55DD67.1070001@lozano.eti.br> <3C55F583.5000709@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <3C5604C1.1040007@lozano.eti.br>

Fernando Lozano wrote:
> I've heard horror stories about upgrading the gcc, glibc or related 
> components from Red Hat.

Don't upgrade.  Install the new sources in a separate location than
the standard ones.  For example specify --prefix /opt/gcc-20020129 (or
whatever you choose), and add /opt/gcc-20020129/bin to your PATH and
/opt/gcc-20020129/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

> May I get just gcj sources and use them without 
> fear or should I look for newer rpms from redhat?

The former.

-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCJ slower than JDK?
  - From: Fernando Lozano

References:
- GCJ slower than JDK?
  - From: Fernando Lozano
- Re: GCJ slower than JDK?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: GCJ slower than JDK?
  - From: Fernando Lozano

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]