Re: Speaking of runtime options

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Nic" == Nic Ferrier <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk> writes:

Nic> The cmd line differences between gcj and javac are to many to
Nic> list.

gcj command-line processing is a lot trickier.
We'd like `gcj -C' to be compatible, but it is possible that gcc won't
let us get there.  In that case we could consider writing a
`javac'-style wrapper ("gcjc"? -- an ugly name) that simply processes
its command-line and then invokes gcj.  (In this situation we would be
free to use GNU getopt, as it is a host-side tool.)

Tom