This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: nogc.cc & darwin
Bryce McKinlay writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> >Bryce McKinlay writes:
> > >
> > > I think we should really be using the libc implementations of these
> > > functions since they are faster (written in assembly). We should only
> > > use the fdlibm math functions for targets that don't have a math library
> > > (and possibly also for StrictMath?)
> >
> >Probably, but until we have a proper implementation of strictfp we're
> >better off with what we've got. At least we're compatible with one
> >Java math library standard...
> AFAIK "strictfp" doesn't have anything to do with the Math.* calls,
> though. You'd still have to call StrictMath.x() if you wanted the strict
> implementation even if your method/class was declared strictfp.
Yeah, I know that. But IMO StrictMath and strictfp naturally go
together. Conceptually, they are very much two parts of a whole.
Andrew.