This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 23 Jan 2002 16:28:56 -0800
Subject: Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions
Organization: Myself
References: <86lmeruye6.fsf@megacz.com> <87sn8wx2tv.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3C4F4708.3080902@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> >Seems like you could use `nm' on the nat*.o files to see what they
> >refer to.

> Not if they're virtual.

Yeah, that was my problem. So I've got a kludgey list of 40 or so
methods that have to be forcibly included, plus all methods on a few
key classes (Object, Class, System, Runtime).

  - a

References:
- progress on method-gc / mangling questions
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]