This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:03:12 -0800
Subject: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10201231534330.2773-100000@mars.deadcafe.org> <3C4F270B.6070105@bothner.com>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> I agree, that should probably be null_pointer_node, though it
> doesn't really matter..  (It gets cast to ptr_type_node anyway.)

Where?  I don't see that.

And it _does_ matter.  The types of the data in static initializers
must be correct, lest varasm.c get confused.  So if you use
integer_zero_node when you really meant a long, the wrong amount
of data will be emitted for 64-bit targets.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]