This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- Cc: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jan 2002 14:11:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include?
- References: <20020110154845.A402@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <3C40D856.8020302@bothner.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
Per> Well, it shouldn't change so often. in fact, it is supposed to
Per> be Java-implementation-dependent. I.e. you should be able to use
Per> the same version of jni.h for code running with GCJ as for code
Per> running under JDK. To the extent you can't do that, it's a bug.
Per> Please submit patches ...
In the past our jni.h wasn't all that implementation independent.
The current CVS version has made progress in this area. I think it is
pretty good right now.
Tom